I guessed wrong

All of them?

Pornography, gambling, celebrity worship, shopping compulsion, junk food, 24 hour news channels, internet, gaming

Organized religion?

The movie is about paranoia

I am perfectly composed

You are - as always - missing the point

Title is more than a little creepy

Imagine a dude wrote an article 'Everything I know about women I learned from "The Sisterhood of the Traveling Pants"'

I mean... have you spoken to any men since watching a horror movie about paranoia?

That's the other thing: this movie is about paranoia in general. You can superimpose any theme on top of that because mass paranoia in the 20th century has many examples to draw from

So the fact that someone projected masculinity paranoia specifically, then used is The Reference Point for relating to all things male of all men... well, like I say creepy af

I DONT KNOW WHAT WE ARE YELLING ABOUT!!!

Gerrymandering and voter suppression mostly I suspect

Also, conveniently, they forgot to mention that young people become old people and old people vote republican

Also - old people vote

What a waste of a stamp

That guy bombs all on his own

But... if he’s not using it why doesn’t he leave it all to charity now?

I really appreciate phrasing aging in every article as a disease in search of a cure

As soon as a person is conceived, they are inflicted with a hereditary strain of aging and spend the next few decades fighting the incurable affliction, eventually succumbing to it due to the fact that mortality rates for aging are 100%

The simple fact that aging is an inevitable outcome of laws of physics which dictate entropy over time for every chemical compound, organic or otherwise, seems to be an afterthought in the elusive search for a cure for aging

If it was fun and easy nobody would pay to do it

People like to do things which are fun and easy

I don't want to pay someone to do something that's fun and easy. I want to do it myself

So if you're getting paid to do it, you can make difficulty be part of the fun but it won't be easy. As soon as it starts getting easy, you'll stop getting paid for it

X – (20 * height/waist circumference) = RFM

what is a healthy RFM range?

For a 196cm tall male, of waste 39cm an RFM index is 64 - (20 * 196/39) = -36 approximately

What does that mean? A negative 36 RFM index in relation to what?

If the waste was the same as the height ie 196cm, the RFM index would be 44

I may not be calculating something correctly...

This is confusing to me

Christopher Lloyd’s narrating makes all the difference