Let me guess, this is according to an anonymous source who doesn't actually have any proof of anything, but who promises that such proof does exist. Am I right?
Edit: Yep, I was right. From the article:
...senior NSA official
Current and former senior intelligence officials...
A senior intelligence official...
Senior intelligence officials...
And not one of them produced any evidence of anything.
It's WaPo, so of course there will be no evidence,and no named sources, but plenty of "might haves" and "maybe dids" and of course, "he should be impeached for it"
They are trying hard to pass CNN in the Fake News sweepstakes.
Let me guess, this is according to an anonymous source who doesn't actually have any proof of anything, but who promises that such proof does exist. Am I right?
Edit: Yep, I was right. From the article:
And not one of them produced any evidence of anything.
It's WaPo, so of course there will be no evidence,and no named sources, but plenty of "might haves" and "maybe dids" and of course, "he should be impeached for it"
They are trying hard to pass CNN in the Fake News sweepstakes.