LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
parent
  • kvn
    +23

    The first comment I have downvoted, it's you, nebraska. He NEVER said that snapzu was a clone, in fact, he heavily implied it was different because he asked for "the Snapzu way of doing things." Stop being rude and just say hello to a friendly new user.

    • Cheesemangeur
      +12

      Don't believe that warranted a downvote to be honest. /u/nebraska wasn't being rude to the person making the snap, he was giving his guidelines to the people who are reading this snap at the moment. And it's a good advice as far as I'm concerned.
      So in this instance you downvoted someone for disagreeing with them, since that user was not using hate speech or being offensive.

      • Axiomatic (edited 3 years ago)
        +6

        I was going to make a remark about that as well, but I decided against it because I believe /u/nebraska's comment falls in a grey area. The comment may not be directly rude or offensive, but it is not very hospitable either. I believe he could have delivered his advice more tactfully, without the kind of tone that often discourages people from posting over at that other website. Not that /u/nebraska didn't have good intentions or didn't contribute to the conversation at all, hence the grey area. I personally feel like this is a situation in which either actions — upvoting or downvoting — are equally justified. Just my two cents. :)

      • FrootLoops (edited 3 years ago)
        +2

        hehe i thought exactly the same and was wondering what /u/kvn was talking about. :) Well i think you see it both ways, only /u/nebraska can tell what he meant.