That's what the bottom half said. The top half discusses how you think anyone that has an accent that you don't approve of is trash, or uneducated. Then you talked about not being racist and acknowledging that everybody's just a little bit racist. But, hey, gold medal in mental gymnastics buddy! Maintaining that kind of cognitive dissonance is hard!
Right, you're not racist at all! You just think anyone that doesn't speak the way you want, act the way you want, or dress the way you want is trash or ignorant! Totally not racist! Man, you sure showed me. I'll never be sarcastic to you again, that's for sure. I mean, you stumbled over a couple special pleading fallacies, a black-or-white fallacy, a no true scotsman fallacy, a genetic fallacy, an anecdotal fallacy, and combined a tu quoque with an ad hominem towards the end there... but you sure displayed your startling debate skills! I'm blinded by your brilliance!
Yeah, I think I'll go talk to a tree. I'm sure I'll find that conversation to be more stimulating and internally consistent.
This is a perfect illustration of what I'm talking about: prejudice based upon dialect or accent. Why do you think these are "trash", but others are "cultural or national"? I assure you that all accents and dialects have a culture.
Just because someone speaks differently then you doesn't mean that they are ignorant or shitty people. You need to get out more if that is seriously your view on people.
[This comment was removed]