You would think so, but they're not going to let facts change their mind. They've already passed judgment and nothing will be allowed to make any difference. After banging my head against the wall for a while, I simply stopped trying to convince people who refuse to be swayed by evidence.
This from someone that wouldn't hear of there being any collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and who, now that's been proven by email leaks, can't bear to hear any talk of President Elect Clinton having ever once broken the law.
Simply being above the law isn't the same thing as not committing crimes. Being unfairly hounded by political enemies isn't the same thing as innocence. How hard is it to work out that one candidate being terrible doesn't necessarily make the other candidate good and decent? What is it that makes people idealize the devil they choose?
The fact that this is pretty obviously not true may help assuage your fears
You would think so, but they're not going to let facts change their mind. They've already passed judgment and nothing will be allowed to make any difference. After banging my head against the wall for a while, I simply stopped trying to convince people who refuse to be swayed by evidence.
This from someone that wouldn't hear of there being any collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and who, now that's been proven by email leaks, can't bear to hear any talk of President Elect Clinton having ever once broken the law.
I rest my case.
Good for you. Maybe now you'll have more time to hear them and judge for yourself.
Simply being above the law isn't the same thing as not committing crimes. Being unfairly hounded by political enemies isn't the same thing as innocence. How hard is it to work out that one candidate being terrible doesn't necessarily make the other candidate good and decent? What is it that makes people idealize the devil they choose?