+41 41 0
Published 7 years ago by spaceghoti with 7 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • RoamingGnome (edited 7 years ago)
    +3

    Of course she is, but it has nothing to do with the debate. She lost in my opinion. She had zero acceptable answers for any of the allegations brought by Trump. Standing there saying nothing is not a satisfactory answer to the question of why 30k+ emails were deleted after the subpoena or when the moderator asked her about her conflict of interest in taking bribes from wealthy people and countries while SoS. I can not believe she is being given a pass on that. It absolutely boggles my mind, and I'm a cynic who expects shit like this. I have a massive problem with her committing multiple felonies and not being held accountable. She is a steaming pile of poo that should not be allowed anywhere near the White House.

    • KratsYnot
      +3

      I have a massive problem with her committing multiple felonies and not being held accountable

      The fact that this is pretty obviously not true may help assuage your fears

      • spaceghoti
        +2

        You would think so, but they're not going to let facts change their mind. They've already passed judgment and nothing will be allowed to make any difference. After banging my head against the wall for a while, I simply stopped trying to convince people who refuse to be swayed by evidence.

        • AdelleChattre
          +1

          This from someone that wouldn't hear of there being any collusion between the DNC and the Clinton campaign, and who, now that's been proven by email leaks, can't bear to hear any talk of President Elect Clinton having ever once broken the law.

          • spaceghoti
            +2

            I rest my case.

            • AdelleChattre
              +1

              Good for you. Maybe now you'll have more time to hear them and judge for yourself.

      • AdelleChattre
        +1

        Simply being above the law isn't the same thing as not committing crimes. Being unfairly hounded by political enemies isn't the same thing as innocence. How hard is it to work out that one candidate being terrible doesn't necessarily make the other candidate good and decent? What is it that makes people idealize the devil they choose?

Here are some other snaps you may like...