“We are not anti-police,” she declared. “We are anti our people being murdered in the streets. What happened to Alton Sterling, what happened to Philando, what happens to so many black people in our communities is absolutely unacceptable, and I think that’s something that we can all agree on.”
Four of their own words succinctly illustrate this organization: "Hands up don't shoot"
One does not have to support this group to take note of inequities, nor agree with their premise. I for one do not support resegregation and that is precisely what this and like groups promote.
Okay. So anyone that objects to prisoners under submission being shot, or to any police murder, is a black separatist? Are the murder victims part of the conspiracy, too?
"Okay. So anyone that objects to prisoners under submission being shot, or to any police murder, is a black separatist?"
This is typical of your every dialogue. My only response to such mischaracterizations, attributions, and just plain dribble is: If you care to comment on something actually stated, please feel free, otherwise you are wasting both my time and yours.
It's too bad you feel the need for this type innuendo. There is a higher road.
I'd been mulling over what you could possibly have meant by calling Black Lives Matter segregationists. Near as I can work out, since you're not lifting any finger to explain yourself, you've got it in mind that their focus on police murder of black people is somehow because they're only concerned when cops kill black folks. To you, perhaps, instead of Black Lives Matter too, you read only Black Lives Matter. Pure speculation, since you're not about to say how you feel.
Segregation: 1.the action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart:
society 1.the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community
Desegregation has been the long attempted goal and necessity to society, thus resgregation would be applicable to any attempts to separate any group into it's own identity or politics, by definition.
If you have truly perused Black Lives Matter website and their rhetoric,.............. your question; this comment's content,..... superfluous.
And… we’re right back at you calling black victims and critics of police brutality and police murder segregationists. Because they’re black. You ain’t calling other victims and critics segregationists. You ain’t calling killer cops segregationists. Time for you to admit some things. Not to anyone else, because you aren't fooling anyone.
You need to freshen your act.
It's not too late, read it now. It's under the headline. It's all one syllable words, except for one two-syllable word. Sound it out.
"What are the chances, I'm wondering to myself right now," that you could ever respond with anything of actual substance.
By the way have you read it?.....Notice anything resembling the quote in my initial comment?
Is it an act or are you really that ignorant?....LOL
All but a very, very few.
Four of their own words succinctly illustrate this organization: "Hands up don't shoot"
One does not have to support this group to take note of inequities, nor agree with their premise. I for one do not support resegregation and that is precisely what this and like groups promote.
Okay. So anyone that objects to prisoners under submission being shot, or to any police murder, is a black separatist? Are the murder victims part of the conspiracy, too?
"Okay. So anyone that objects to prisoners under submission being shot, or to any police murder, is a black separatist?"
This is typical of your every dialogue. My only response to such mischaracterizations, attributions, and just plain dribble is: If you care to comment on something actually stated, please feel free, otherwise you are wasting both my time and yours.
It's too bad you feel the need for this type innuendo. There is a higher road.
I'd been mulling over what you could possibly have meant by calling Black Lives Matter segregationists. Near as I can work out, since you're not lifting any finger to explain yourself, you've got it in mind that their focus on police murder of black people is somehow because they're only concerned when cops kill black folks. To you, perhaps, instead of Black Lives Matter too, you read only Black Lives Matter. Pure speculation, since you're not about to say how you feel.
I should guess you might learn a thing or two by a visit to their website.
No "too"s there.
I’ve been. Where’s the ‘resegregation’ you’re on about?
Segregation: 1.the action or state of setting someone or something apart from other people or things or being set apart:
society 1.the aggregate of people living together in a more or less ordered community
Desegregation has been the long attempted goal and necessity to society, thus resgregation would be applicable to any attempts to separate any group into it's own identity or politics, by definition.
If you have truly perused Black Lives Matter website and their rhetoric,.............. your question; this comment's content,..... superfluous.
And… we’re right back at you calling black victims and critics of police brutality and police murder segregationists. Because they’re black. You ain’t calling other victims and critics segregationists. You ain’t calling killer cops segregationists. Time for you to admit some things. Not to anyone else, because you aren't fooling anyone.
Of course.
Or off, all the same to you.
I'd've gone to PM a while ago, but you've got it switched off.
I don't do PM, if you have something to say,.....say it here.
Keeps everything "on the up and up", ya know?