LOL , What I presented is irrefutable evidence from ice core samples dating back hundreds of thousands of years. If you wish to concentrate on 1500 year cycles, have fun with that, Your proffer is like comparing a moment to a decade. The chart offered clearly shows approx 100,000 year cycles, all comparable, spikes in methane, CO2, and temperature, clearly substantiating my initial comment.
"If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".
Meaning you didn't even bother to read the link. So here's a helpful TL;DR for you: just because the climate has changed in the past doesn't mean the current trend is natural or any less dangerous for the current biological paradigm, meaning us.
The evidence is clear, Isn't it a shame history does have a way of repeating, ad infinitum,
And I'm the "denier"?....LOL
An inconvenient truth? Every historic chart shows the same basic trend(s), and are products of , not "Climate deniers" but "accepted" Climatologists.............. Ooops
Again..............."If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do............. "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".
http://www.exploratorium.edu/climate/cryosphere/data2.html, Of course you do not recognize/accept the trends/patterns/cycles;-(
whatever.
They've got your number there, too: http://skepticalscience.com/1500-year-natural-cycle.htm
LOL , What I presented is irrefutable evidence from ice core samples dating back hundreds of thousands of years. If you wish to concentrate on 1500 year cycles, have fun with that, Your proffer is like comparing a moment to a decade. The chart offered clearly shows approx 100,000 year cycles, all comparable, spikes in methane, CO2, and temperature, clearly substantiating my initial comment.
"If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".
Meaning you didn't even bother to read the link. So here's a helpful TL;DR for you: just because the climate has changed in the past doesn't mean the current trend is natural or any less dangerous for the current biological paradigm, meaning us.
The evidence is clear, Isn't it a shame history does have a way of repeating, ad infinitum,
And I'm the "denier"?....LOL
An inconvenient truth? Every historic chart shows the same basic trend(s), and are products of , not "Climate deniers" but "accepted" Climatologists.............. Ooops
Again..............."If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do............. "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".