Meaning you didn't even bother to read the link. So here's a helpful TL;DR for you: just because the climate has changed in the past doesn't mean the current trend is natural or any less dangerous for the current biological paradigm, meaning us.
The evidence is clear, Isn't it a shame history does have a way of repeating, ad infinitum,
And I'm the "denier"?....LOL
An inconvenient truth? Every historic chart shows the same basic trend(s), and are products of , not "Climate deniers" but "accepted" Climatologists.............. Ooops
Again..............."If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do............. "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".
Meaning you didn't even bother to read the link. So here's a helpful TL;DR for you: just because the climate has changed in the past doesn't mean the current trend is natural or any less dangerous for the current biological paradigm, meaning us.
The evidence is clear, Isn't it a shame history does have a way of repeating, ad infinitum,
And I'm the "denier"?....LOL
An inconvenient truth? Every historic chart shows the same basic trend(s), and are products of , not "Climate deniers" but "accepted" Climatologists.............. Ooops
Again..............."If at first you don't succeed,"............Please do............. "try, try again. Then quit. There's no point in being a damn fool about it. W. C. Fields".