"The worst that would happen is that climate change turns out not to be a big deal", for you that's the "worst" ? .........It doesn't matter to you that policies professed to mitigate these assumptions will cost consumers trillions in price and taxes? The cost of electricity already reflects just such reactions, and affects who the most?........The poor! ..But of course if "progress" is to be made, some must be left behind by your standards "That's not so bad is it?"
No, your not talking from my viewpoint, rather to your attributions. I do not need "citations" proposed carbon taxes, and existing electric rate hikes more than substantiate my claim. "Why is it bad for us to move to better forms of energy, but okay to subsidize fossil fuel industries?" Only you seems to be arguing that point.
Nope, citations are not needed, as I deem it ..........."You do if you want to argue. The burden of proof is on you." ......Seems you joined this discourse, not initiated it. Besides I have no "burden of proof" just facts you seem unable to refute. ...When will your alternate energy sources be as inexpensive as coal is today? The poor suffer without expensive electricity, as we all will pay for the increases, not just for our homes but practically for every product, the double whammy for everyone, esp those least able to afford it.
Precisely, "the impact of CO2 in our atmosphere". The admitted Climate alarmists have screwed it up royal for everyone.
The impact on plants The impact on earth
We are living it, LOL. Do you need a more verifiable laboratory?
[This comment was removed]