I can not respond to what you meant only what you present. You have latched on to a political narrative, that includes disrespect for an entire occupation. Wearable cameras?, You have not thought through the considerations of when they should be on or off. Sure there are excesses as there are in any organizations with the size and numbers of U.S. police forces. Your gripe is about the amount, so show the statistical evidence, not nebulous rhetoric as to the extent/size of the problem, otherwise you do no more than support political pandering.

Honestly I'm not here to argue semantics with you, both of us had ample time to present our opinions and highlight our concerns. There really is no point to go further into this discussion.

You are definitely not here "to argue semantics", ... not applicable, however our last discussion concerning this subject was terminated when you were similarly challenged.

To be frank arguing with you is pointless. The proof is all around you, I won't play librarian.

To argue one gives reason(s), cites evidence, again not applicable. The redirection and misrepresentation you display is diatribe.

And thus arguing with you is pointless. Too much effort for a lost cause.

You do go on;).............. you need to take a deep breath, and a big ole shot of Beam.