You are definitely not here "to argue semantics", ... not applicable, however our last discussion concerning this subject was terminated when you were similarly challenged.
To be frank arguing with you is pointless. The proof is all around you, I won't play librarian.
To argue one gives reason(s), cites evidence, again not applicable. The redirection and misrepresentation you display is diatribe.
And thus arguing with you is pointless. Too much effort for a lost cause.
You do go on;).............. you need to take a deep breath, and a big ole shot of Beam.
Hah don't have Beam, but I am on my 4th beer :D
You are definitely not here "to argue semantics", ... not applicable, however our last discussion concerning this subject was terminated when you were similarly challenged.
To be frank arguing with you is pointless. The proof is all around you, I won't play librarian.
To argue one gives reason(s), cites evidence, again not applicable. The redirection and misrepresentation you display is diatribe.
And thus arguing with you is pointless. Too much effort for a lost cause.
You do go on;).............. you need to take a deep breath, and a big ole shot of Beam.
Hah don't have Beam, but I am on my 4th beer :D