LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • legionairy

    I think Microsoft is in a really tough spot with this one. It really isn't as simple as getting rid of the Kinect that comes with every Xbox. It's pretty well known that the reason that it's included is so that devs have more incentives to integrate the Kinect into their games. Microsoft may have to start selling their consoles at a loss in order to get back into the game with Playstation.

    • drunkenninja

      Isn't that what they have been doing for the better part of Xbox one's existence? Selling it at a loss?