+40 41 1
Published 8 years ago by drunkenninja with 14 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Harold
    +10

    This sounds too good to be true, does anyone know the potential downsides to this surgery/lens?

    • picklefingers
      +9

      Over on reddit.com/r/futurology, their thread for this almost immediately killed the buzz.

      Ophthalmologist here. This keeps getting posted and is a lot more hype than substance. This is nothing more than an intraocular lens. We use these every day in cataract surgery already when we remove a patient's current lens and replace it with an artificial one. The "holy grail" of intraocular lens technology has always been a lens that offers a complete range of vision (distance, intermediate, near) much like when we are young (for people without glasses). Looking at the website for this lens' company, there is very little in the way of explanation on how this lens works. There is no press on this in the ophthalmic community. This lens is being promoted without any proof that it works and without any details on how it works. I wouldn't be surprised if the hype was coming from the maker of the lens to drum up investors. Until I see something about HOW this lens works, I'm not holding my breath. If this truly does what the inventor says (doubtful), if would obviously be a game changer and I'm sure I'll be the first in line to implant it into my patients. Tl;dr This is pure hype and no substance. No proof this lens works and no details on how it works. Don't hold your breath.

      • anjin
        +2

        so basically it's the E-Cat of lenses... damn science baiting!

    • spaceghoti
      +7

      Not yet. It's still in trials in both Europe and the US so they don't have to release that kind of information. According to the link I added to this they're hoping to be approved in Europe in a couple of years and North America a few years after that.

  • trendkill
    +7

    Sounds like it wouldn't help for people with keratoconus like me since it's replacing the lens rather than doing anything with the cornea. It's a shame, a lot of the up and coming vision treatments are focused on cataracts and myopia/hyperopia rather than corneal issues. Makes sense, I suppose, since those things are far more common. Just bites for me personally.

  • KingAztek
    +5

    As someone who is nearsighted in one eye, far sighted in the other, and has astigmatism in the farsighted eye, this would be glorious.

    • sushmonster
      +2

      Are you not viable for LASIK? I had the procedure done in January and it has changed my life!

      • KingAztek
        +3

        I'm only 19, so they'd have to see that vision has been stable for the last year before I can be declared viable. There's also that pesky thing about not having insurance anymore :P

  • caelreth
    +5

    Sweet! Bionic humans, here we come!

    • Moderator
      +5

      Can't wait to poop nuts and bolts.

      • caelreth
        +3

        Ooh, that is the dream, isn't it? :)

      • anjin
        +2

        I already do that, haven't gotten over the "putting things in your mouth"-phase

  • ttubravesrock
    +4

    what percentage of humans would have to have this lens before it's no longer super-human?

    • judah (edited 8 years ago)
      +4

      I don’t see how widespread adoption would change anything to the fact that it’s not a natural feature. That’s my understanding of “super-human”, at least.

  • Winter
    +3

    Well, it looks great, but I definitely think there will be downsides.

Here are some other snaps you may like...