Doesn't strike me as the kind of federal bureaucrat that's overly concerned with protecting and defending the emoluments clause of the Constitution. Still, finding something to charge Trump on shouldn't take this long, should it? He's a cheap grifter. If any of this were real, I mean.
I do believe that's the one.
Doesn't strike me as the kind of federal bureaucrat that's overly concerned with protecting and defending the emoluments clause of the Constitution. Still, finding something to charge Trump on shouldn't take this long, should it? He's a cheap grifter. If any of this were real, I mean.
It shouldn't. He was relentlessly vetted during the primary and general, and the worst that was found was rough "sex talk".
The collusion story was the "insurance policy" and the explanation why Hillary's "98% chance to win" didn't happen.