LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • leweb
    +6

    Why not? The employees are letting it happen. People still let the company be profitable.

    You have thousands (or more) people doing nothing about it. Why should the executives voluntarily give up their money? It’s called capitalism.

    • AdelleChattre (edited 8 months ago)
      +7

      Is it capitalism though? Civilizations and societies of all types and kinds throughout history seem to gravitate to a condition where a tiny wealthy elite rules disposable people. Inequality like this strikes me as more of a corporate feudalism than capitalism. Even in utopian schemes with the best of intentions the flaw seems to be in the division of labor. As in: "I'll divide you guys, and then you guys do the labor."