i'm sorry, but to me it always seemed much more of a commentary on not only her stodgy, stuck-up, conformist, government bureaucrat nature, not a personal statement on fashion. anything but. i think this article is just another example of people today attempting to co-opting yesterday's pop-culture for today's purposes while fundamentally misunderstanding the original message or intent.
i'm sorry, but to me it always seemed much more of a commentary on not only her stodgy, stuck-up, conformist, government bureaucrat nature, not a personal statement on fashion. anything but. i think this article is just another example of people today attempting to co-opting yesterday's pop-culture for today's purposes while fundamentally misunderstanding the original message or intent.
is it naiveté? is it ignorance? or it it just blind, selfish, determinism to make their dammed point, no matter what past pop-culture treasures are violated? sheesh.