LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • FurtWigglepants
    +4

    Well I mean california and texas alone almost have the same population as germany... Also why would they separate England and wales? Not saying US stats aren't high(they are) it's just this isn't a fair metric with population sizes/density alone.

    • nrevan (edited 3 years ago)
      0

      That is true! I also want to add on one point: the different "policies" (for the lack of a better word) between the individual countries compared. For example, the vast majority of Singapore citizens cannot own firearms legally and in my opinion this poses far less threats to policeman involved. In other words if law enforcement have the general impression that the criminals they're facing are armed (and therefore lethally dangerous), they thus have more justification (in their own minds at least) to use lethal force. Can't comment on the rest, only resided in Singapore before!

      While it could be also true that many cases in the US involves unarmed criminals, but I'd argue that there could be a general mindset of violence and danger in these areas where police serve in (pure speculation, I don't know personally), which furthers their mindset that whenever someone is (or appears) threatening, then there is a high chance of the threat being a lethal one. Their response is often lethal ("if I didn't shoot him first I'd be dead already"), and is certainly a product of the human survival instinct. Who truly desires to be killed on duty after all?

      There are non-lethal options definitely, but I don't know much about it to comment on it further.. What do you guys think?

      • FurtWigglepants
        +1

        The prevalence of gangs in California doesn't help either.