Newsline.com, the nth-hand hearsay blogspam gutter this poster got this link from, is your 'go to' site for stories in which immigrants rape and murder their way through your home town. A very special, prominently-featured one today comes from Louisiana. If what you want is immigrants raping and murdering, look no further!
Read about all that and how Scott Baio was savagely attacked at the inauguration, how Muslim terrorist groups secretly organized the March for Women, and the deadly threat Black Lives Matter poses to Philadelphia schoolteachers, today!
Newsline.com: we type up stuff we heard somebody say they saw someone else said was mentioned in another thread somewhere, so you don't have to.
Your county health department inspects restaurants in your area, evaluates them around criteria like cleanliness and food safety, passing some and failing others. That make them hypocrites?
Somehow I don’t think they’re eating off every dish that comes out of a tainted kitchen. Beyond that, you’ve got me “swearing by” bugaboos of yours you’ve selected at random. You make this stuff up. Guess which of those three sites I can hardly stand.
This notion that you can only post things you agree with is absurd. I posted something yesterday that I loathe.
Maybe this is your problem. If you can't imagine upvoting something you disagree with because it was interesting, informative, nuanced or just for what it did for the conversation, you're doing this wrong.
Newsline.com, the nth-hand hearsay blogspam gutter this poster got this link from, is your 'go to' site for stories in which immigrants rape and murder their way through your home town. A very special, prominently-featured one today comes from Louisiana. If what you want is immigrants raping and murdering, look no further!
Read about all that and how Scott Baio was savagely attacked at the inauguration, how Muslim terrorist groups secretly organized the March for Women, and the deadly threat Black Lives Matter poses to Philadelphia schoolteachers, today!
Newsline.com: we type up stuff we heard somebody say they saw someone else said was mentioned in another thread somewhere, so you don't have to.
One can read a story and actually bother to offer criticism based on facts therein, or dismiss it as trash outright. based on it's origin.
Your comment coming from one who swears by RollingStone, Mother Jones, Vox, and the like would be an example of nuttin more than,
hypocrisy.
Your county health department inspects restaurants in your area, evaluates them around criteria like cleanliness and food safety, passing some and failing others. That make them hypocrites?
I hope they don't judge the place by the sign outside, rather actually enter and evaluate content/practices.
LOL
Somehow I don’t think they’re eating off every dish that comes out of a tainted kitchen. Beyond that, you’ve got me “swearing by” bugaboos of yours you’ve selected at random. You make this stuff up. Guess which of those three sites I can hardly stand.
Since there is documented evidence you've submitted from all three.
Guess?......... I can't
This notion that you can only post things you agree with is absurd. I posted something yesterday that I loathe.
Maybe this is your problem. If you can't imagine upvoting something you disagree with because it was interesting, informative, nuanced or just for what it did for the conversation, you're doing this wrong.
"Beyond that, you’ve got me “swearing by” bugaboos of yours you’ve selected at random. You make this stuff up."
You simply lied, ......fess up. ....No more need said.
Have a good one.