Yes, you personally can feel however want. Human suffering is subjective, nuanced– to say the least, and therefor difficult to quantify with a monetary value. and i'm not responding to your comment to debate semantics, but i do hear (more often than I would like to) leaders/thinkers in contemporary American politics/government citing christianity (and the bible specifically) as the root or seed theory to the united states political philosophy concerning supreme law and foundation of this countries government, and I don't disagree (not entirely) with this widely supported ideology. However, the ramifications of christian implementations to US law and global international policy is very measurable and undeniable. I personally feel restitution for all unjust [christian] enrichment is long overdue and a moral obligation our government no longer can ignore, it's the christian/right thing to do. I think all governments and influential global religions need to take this first step. And so I find the second sentence in your response, particularly the word "more," to be indolent, IMHO; I've read some of your other comments, you're better than that friend.

Since there are far more victims of the radicalized Christian Right than of radicalized Islamic groups in the US, we'd be better off helping the ones we can reach first.

Think globally, act locally.