Mind you, the sham expert being interviewed here shows every sign of being a crank whose 'expertise' consists of smearing Ed Snowden as a spy.
Instead of "Snowden acting very strange", a more appropriate headline might have been;
"Jilted, neglected Russian journalist pouts on The Daily Beast."
Better title from the comments section
Mind you, the sham expert being interviewed here shows every sign of being a crank whose 'expertise' consists of smearing Ed Snowden as a spy.
Instead of "Snowden acting very strange", a more appropriate headline might have been;
"Jilted, neglected Russian journalist pouts on The Daily Beast."
Better title from the comments section