What is interesting to me is that there are craft brewers who only sell in very limited ranges but they are in the top 25. It really says how much sales go to the big 3 brewers and to the import market.

True, I was implying that the reason they limited it was because they didn't have the hardware to support the total number of end users but that's because I was being generous to the developers. In reality you are most likely correct.

There is also a problem of more people getting college degrees than ever before. I have seen engineers flipping burgers for a year or two while they looked for a job in the 2008-12 recession. We need an over arching change in how we view productivity and compensation. We have one of the larger income inequalities for a developed country and it is growing. Free college isn't enough, it turns college into high school ie everyone goes so to stand out you need to get a masters or PhD.

Yeah, but I would expect that they have the hardware to increase the field size. It's a simple as changing the field definition ex. varchar(25) instead of varchar(12). For password length limit is it possible that they are using tokenization? I am assuming not, and that it is simply plan text, or they check length first then hash.

I was just about to post this exact same thing. I even have some that prevented me from having a longer user name, I think I was limited to something like 12 characters. I don't understand these limitations, I don't know what system they are using that require it or if they just have a bad system design.

Awesome resource.

This is just like what happens with the commissaries in prison. The fees to add money just wipes out any money that people can put in. We really need to reform our prisons. My view is if we a society decide we need to take away their freedom, we need to pay for it, not the families or the prisoners. I think that making the government pay to put them away will really cause us to look at what crimes we are really willing to punish with long prison sentences. We would also need to eliminate the kickbacks from companies that provide services, so the government is really looking to make the best choice via cost and benefits.

Yeah, I responded that I would have expected some of that to have been done in this section of research, just not published in this article.

True, but the animal studies should have shed some light into that. They used two different animal models and one cell line? They might not have done any extensive dosing tests, or looked for adverse effects in the animal models. I would assume that they would have done a least some of that since the student would be following the animals status. It depends on how long they think it will take to develop a model. I would expect this would be 3-6 years research in my experience to build a decent model of what is going on. That also assumes that they maintain a sufficient funding level which is never a known factor.

I am not sure why this couldn't go to phase 1 trials right now? I know they don't know why it works but we don't know why a lot of drugs work. Phase 1 would just be on health individuals to determine what dosage is safe.

Yeah that seems like a reasonable response to missing a stop. I hope he gets a good punishment for it.

Thanks for the link. It was a fun read.

The problem is the business is owned by the government. So really it is owned by the government and they are stuck with the bills. I am shocked that they kept finding such incompetent people. Seems like the current one might get the job done.

Its worth the read, but those colors make it tough.