parent
  • folkrav
    +1

    That wasn't really on-topic, you said it in my other post already, no need to target every single one of my replies to say that! :)

    Still, pretty funny getting that from /u/cunt

    • cunt (edited 8 years ago)
      +1

      I didn't actually realise it was the same user but yes the whole: its beautiful so we'll call it *.porn is idiotic

      • folkrav
        +1

        But why is it that idiotic? Honestly, the issue is the keyword based filters, not so much the .porn thing.

      • cunt
        +2
        @folkrav -

        The issue is not just with keyword filters. Porn - as everyone would assume is to do with sex. To name something *.porn which is nothing to do with sex and could be everything to do with something educational/beautiful is idiotic as it can cause confusion and due to these filters, as well as their own caution - people to lose out