May I suggest you've gotten so little out of people's responses because you've put so little into understanding them? I feel as though you've given my response very short shrift.
Again as you claim you skimmed and in doing so you made an erroneous generalization. I will explain below as again your points (I still don't really know if you have one) is all over the place. I can't comprehend how asking how they arrived at that answer is a lack of understanding? Asking them to provide incite is the exact opposite not trying to understand.
Opinion: [...] Bias: [...]As much as I appreciate your taking time out of your day to explain four and seven letter words to me, because apparently I wouldn't've encountered these before and need them explained.
You apparently needed them to be explained because I am using them correctly as shown.
There's a problem. Using the system you're describing, if someone else makes a statement, and it doesn't square with your secret homespun mix of dogma,
Again your lack of understanding of the definitions you are using is comical. If you provide no evidence to support your opinion after being asked numerous times it is bias, prejudice and gibberish. That is a fact. For example, if you were to say Pit bulls are more aggressive than most breeds that is not an opinion but a false fact. And the use of the word Fact is very broad. For example, the National Center for Science education defines fact as: Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” To quote Stephen Jay Gould who is an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science“In science, ‘fact’ can only mean ‘confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent. " For an example it is considered a FACT that all humans have 46 chromosomes. However, that can change over time. People still debate the fact that the Earth is Round.
Am I taking crazy pills or have you gotten 'facts' mixed up with 'axioms' and 'propositions' and 'inferences' and 'beliefs' all at once?
You really are taking the crazy pill. As per above I am using the word fact and other words just fine.
However, you keep using the word dogma out of context. [Dogma is a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted] (a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted) Dogma [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma] (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma) . [A doctrine or a corpus of doctrines relating to matters such as morality and faith, set forth in an authoritative manner by a religion] (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dogma) Statement of facts are not a belief nor is an opinion based on verifiable data.
And if you want to state inference instead of an opinion to try and sound smart it is not working. An inference requires "a statement of fact to interpret, draw logical conclusions from given data, and project implications from the facts". So again I fail to see what you are trying to conclude. We draw inferences from factual observations. In hard sciences, many use the term theory which is defined is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and...
May I suggest you've gotten so little out of people's responses because you've put so little into understanding them? I feel as though you've given my response very short shrift.
Again as you claim you skimmed and in doing so you made an erroneous generalization. I will explain below as again your points (I still don't really know if you have one) is all over the place. I can't comprehend how asking how they arrived at that answer is a lack of understanding? Asking them to provide incite is the exact opposite not trying to understand.
Opinion: [...] Bias: [...]As much as I appreciate your taking time out of your day to explain four and seven letter words to me, because apparently I wouldn't've encountered these before and need them explained.
You apparently needed them to be explained because I am using them correctly as shown.
There's a problem. Using the system you're describing, if someone else makes a statement, and it doesn't square with your secret homespun mix of dogma,
Again your lack of understanding of the definitions you are using is comical. If you provide no evidence to support your opinion after being asked numerous times it is bias, prejudice and gibberish. That is a fact. For example, if you were to say Pit bulls are more aggressive than most breeds that is not an opinion but a false fact. And the use of the word Fact is very broad. For example, the National Center for Science education defines fact as: Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” To quote Stephen Jay Gould who is an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science“In science, ‘fact’ can only mean ‘confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent. " For an example it is considered a FACT that all humans have 46 chromosomes. However, that can change over time. People still debate the fact that the Earth is Round.
Am I taking crazy pills or have you gotten 'facts' mixed up with 'axioms' and 'propositions' and 'inferences' and 'beliefs' all at once?
You really are taking the crazy pill. As per above I am using the word fact and other words just fine.
However, you keep using the word dogma out of context. [Dogma is a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted] (a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted) Dogma [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma] (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma) . [A doctrine or a corpus of doctrines relating to matters such as morality and faith, set forth in an authoritative manner by a religion] (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dogma) Statement of facts are not a belief nor is an opinion based on verifiable data.
And if you want to state inference instead of an opinion to try and sound smart it is not working. An inference requires "a statement of fact to interpret, draw logical conclusions from given data, and project implications from the facts". So again I fail to see what you are trying to conclude. We draw inferences from factual observations. In hard sciences, many use the term theory which is defined is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and experiment. You would be laughed at to try and disprove a theory which many call fact (as shown above).
No wonder every response you get comes through as gibberish.
LOL the irony a statement of fact a false one at that. Actually, many respect my opinion. Did I mention debate team and I email many who I cite to discuss? Your bias is looking at the few who I have ongoing replies to. Anonymity breeds contempt for some.
IYou got sex wrong because you used an ancient religious text as absolute truth. Hang on that, accept it, work with that realization, and move on from there
Wow, I am going to have to call you ignorant at this point. A Christian CONSIDERS the bible absolute truth. That is a FACT. So the best way to debate a Christian is to use what they consider absolute truth. So again please stop skimming and read it.
You really, really ought to go back and reread my response again. Take your time. Jabberwocky jobsworth soda fountain Uhuru.You've also confused your aching, patrician American Christian Dominionist messiah complex for absolute truth.
Lol I did and it is very painful. Again read the above response. Whether I believe the bible is the absolute truth is irrelevant. If you debating a book, the book is your guide. I could only assume you never did a book report or a DBQ.
No, you've simply not paid attention.
I think you were under the assumption that I would not actually read what you wrote. I still don't understand what you are trying to prove? So you encourage people to state incorrect data? Do you encourage people to stick to their biases and prejudices? Because all I ask is to substantiate your reasoning. Sorry I am not gullible.
Maybe you are the B.O.B to astrophysicist Neil DeGrasse Tyson:
"If you want to think the world is flat, go right ahead. But if you think the world is flat and you have influence over others, as with successful rappers, or even presidential candidates, then being wrong becomes being harmful to the health, the wealth and the security of our citizenry."
There are many Flat earthers that think it is not a fact. I sense you might be one of those conspiracy theorists if you are having trouble with anything I am saying. Again if you have any issue with my articles, debate them.
My article stated Facts. My title Pit Bull prejudice defies logic is a fact because of Fact 1: Studies show that Pit Bulls were not more aggressive than other breeds. Fact 2: There are no peer-reviewed studies that show Pit Bulls are dangerous and should have restrictive laws. Fact #3 Every Authoritative body with leading experts backing them call for BSL. Fact 4: The American Bar has also stated BSL is discriminatory due to lack of evidence. Fact 5: There has been no aggressive gene found in the Pit Bull. Fact 6: as of 2016 in humans, the warrior gene, homosexual gene, pedophile gene and any other gene to justify behavior has been disproven. A publication from the American Psychological Association and American Psychiatric association includes admissions that there is no “gay” gene. The warrior gene has been studied maybe even before the 90's, so....
This is a problem. Snapzu has a lenient policy around editing your comments, so one ought not to abuse it. If you need to, compose your comments off-line.
So does Reddit, facebook, twitter, Hubski, Google Plus, Disqus and many other places. And in all honesty, my rough draft seems to be more put together than your final one.
Do consider posting and commenting in some proportion to your self-promotion. The rule calls for a 10:1 ratio. Aim for that at first.
I actually asked the admin and I am good to go. The TOS states the 10:1 rule is only if you do not stay active in my post. Since the TOS used "and" which is an addition, I would need to violate both 10 percent and not replying back. I was ok by the rules but wanted to make sure I abide by the spirit as well as the letter of the law.
Again as you claim you skimmed and in doing so you made an erroneous generalization. I will explain below as again your points (I still don't really know if you have one) is all over the place. I can't comprehend how asking how they arrived at that answer is a lack of understanding? Asking them to provide incite is the exact opposite not trying to understand.
You apparently needed them to be explained because I am using them correctly as shown.
Again your lack of understanding of the definitions you are using is comical. If you provide no evidence to support your opinion after being asked numerous times it is bias, prejudice and gibberish. That is a fact. For example, if you were to say Pit bulls are more aggressive than most breeds that is not an opinion but a false fact. And the use of the word Fact is very broad. For example, the National Center for Science education defines fact as: Fact: In science, an observation that has been repeatedly confirmed and for all practical purposes is accepted as “true.” To quote Stephen Jay Gould who is an American paleontologist, evolutionary biologist, and historian of science“In science, ‘fact’ can only mean ‘confirmed to such a degree that it would be perverse to withhold provisional assent. " For an example it is considered a FACT that all humans have 46 chromosomes. However, that can change over time. People still debate the fact that the Earth is Round.
You really are taking the crazy pill. As per above I am using the word fact and other words just fine.
However, you keep using the word dogma out of context. [Dogma is a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted] (a belief or set of beliefs that is accepted by the members of a group without being questioned or doubted) Dogma [http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma] (http://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/dogma) . [A doctrine or a corpus of doctrines relating to matters such as morality and faith, set forth in an authoritative manner by a religion] (http://www.thefreedictionary.com/dogma) Statement of facts are not a belief nor is an opinion based on verifiable data.
And if you want to state inference instead of an opinion to try and sound smart it is not working. An inference requires "a statement of fact to interpret, draw logical conclusions from given data, and project implications from the facts". So again I fail to see what you are trying to conclude. We draw inferences from factual observations. In hard sciences, many use the term theory which is defined is a well-substantiated explanation of some aspect of the natural world, based on a body of facts that have been repeatedly confirmed through observation and...
... Read Full