LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
parent
  • SevenTales
    +3

    Hello!
    Well first of all, for the downvote system, I had an idea yesterday, which I will repost here : The upvote system already servers the purpose of weeding out the best content and sending it to the top. A downvote currently acts much the same way, but with added force, which really isn't all that useful.
    Why not make the downvote give a reason for the downvote, which could be transparent to the owner of the comment.
    Example:
    This comment has 5 downvotes:
    3x Harassing
    1x non-constructive (does not contribute)
    1x Bad Language

    Reasons I see would be a downvote:
    Harassment (covers hate speech and racism and others), Does not contribute to the discussion, Violent language, spam, Troll, Over self-promoting, Does not belong to the tribe.
    The downvote system should work like a soft report system, instead of a disagree button. And since there is no disagree choice in there, you limit the times the system will be abused.

    As for communication, I really like the transparency displayed by the admins here. The more involved admins will be in actually explaining things to their community, the less the risk of a backlash in case of a misunderstood move, but much more than that, I really like to see involved admins. It makes it seem much more important and personal, to me.

    • exegesispieces
      +5

      I was under the impression that a system very similar to what you are describing was already in place. When you down vote you are asked for a reason why you down voted that is displayed to the poster so they knew why they were being down voted.

      I thought I read that somewhere. I could be mistaken though.

      • SevenTales
        +2

        I test downvoted you, and the upvoted you after to balance, but the only thing that happens is your get -1, and nothing popped up.

        • Cobbydaler
          +4

          As mentioned above categorization of downvotes only applies to snaps, not text posts or comments.

          • SevenTales
            +3

            Yeah, I saw it just after replying. Thanks for the update!