LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+16 16 0
Published 3 years ago with 1 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • AdelleChattre (edited 3 years ago)

    Vapid hit piece. The author is no Hedrick Smith. Not so much unknowing as willfully ignorant, the intention of the piece seems to be recycling New York Times apocrypha for a new readership. Understanding modern Russia through the contents of the Times's reporting is more than a fool’s errand, it’s idiotic. So completely does the writer tow the Times line, right down to spinning the nature of the revolution in Ukraine, that the Kiev Post ran this article as is. What's next, rattling chains and low groaning sounds? Are we meant to be scared by trite hackery like this?

Here are some other snaps you may like...