Oh, look, a snarky response from the "famous" spaceghoti. Talking about me behind my back. Discounting my comment with two quick words instead of a discussion about said article. I thought y'all were different. I was brave enough to respond to "care to elaborate?" only to get knocked down. Thanks. At least I didn't get downvoted, amirite? That is your claim to fame, eh? I thought five to eight word responses were not acceptable either. A whole lot of promises broken, if you ask me.
I'm sorry, what promises did I make to you? I'm sorry that you didn't find the hivemind you were looking for but yes, I'm going to find and post material that I think accurately reflects reality. You are not obligated to agree with me. But I responded to snark with snark, and I make no apologies for accurately predicting what your complaint would be.
Ha ha, hivemind I'm looking for? That's rich. I never said you made promises. Snapzu has been "guiding" new users all weekend to respect this kinder site than we're used to. Those promises. Anyway, go on with your bad self.
So if I understand you correctly you opened with a hostile comment describing Snapzu as "biased, slanted, closed minded" and now you're objecting because it elicited responses in kind? Just so we're all on the same page here.
And yet, here he is, with his comment still above zero, because you guys are so petrified to downvote. So, if the community at large agrees he has a valid enough opinion, then have a discussion with him. Quit arguing about petty bullshit.
Oh, look, a snarky response from the "famous" spaceghoti. Talking about me behind my back. Discounting my comment with two quick words instead of a discussion about said article. I thought y'all were different. I was brave enough to respond to "care to elaborate?" only to get knocked down. Thanks. At least I didn't get downvoted, amirite? That is your claim to fame, eh? I thought five to eight word responses were not acceptable either. A whole lot of promises broken, if you ask me.
I'm sorry, what promises did I make to you? I'm sorry that you didn't find the hivemind you were looking for but yes, I'm going to find and post material that I think accurately reflects reality. You are not obligated to agree with me. But I responded to snark with snark, and I make no apologies for accurately predicting what your complaint would be.
Ha ha, hivemind I'm looking for? That's rich. I never said you made promises. Snapzu has been "guiding" new users all weekend to respect this kinder site than we're used to. Those promises. Anyway, go on with your bad self.
So if I understand you correctly you opened with a hostile comment describing Snapzu as "biased, slanted, closed minded" and now you're objecting because it elicited responses in kind? Just so we're all on the same page here.
Like I said, you go on with your bad self.
And yet, here he is, with his comment still above zero, because you guys are so petrified to downvote. So, if the community at large agrees he has a valid enough opinion, then have a discussion with him. Quit arguing about petty bullshit.