I'm going to assume you are referring to Snapzu as "this site" and say I don't think the content being shared is indicative of an entire site being biased. If the users of the site generally approve of and upvote the content, then you can say the users are biased, slanted, and close-minded. However your criticism would be far better received with a proper response to the article than some attack on its perceived value here.
no, no, no, Salon.com. Its own CEO calls it a liberal tabloid. Putting an article there that is not bashed for its bias immediately and all the hoity toity, well, um hum, yes I see that this is true type discussion, is not and indication of an open and fair community that Snapzu has been touting.
If this is tabloid type Journalism, then where are the lies? Can you sight something in the article which is untrue, misquoted, or manipulated? I understand that it is pro-left, but the problem I see with the left and the right is, the right seems not to be interested in factual information.
The first paragraph seen cites a liberal tabloid (the CEO's own words) calling out two Hispanics' "ugly bigotry," and you want me to elaborate?
I'm going to assume you are referring to Snapzu as "this site" and say I don't think the content being shared is indicative of an entire site being biased. If the users of the site generally approve of and upvote the content, then you can say the users are biased, slanted, and close-minded. However your criticism would be far better received with a proper response to the article than some attack on its perceived value here.
no, no, no, Salon.com. Its own CEO calls it a liberal tabloid. Putting an article there that is not bashed for its bias immediately and all the hoity toity, well, um hum, yes I see that this is true type discussion, is not and indication of an open and fair community that Snapzu has been touting.
If this is tabloid type Journalism, then where are the lies? Can you sight something in the article which is untrue, misquoted, or manipulated? I understand that it is pro-left, but the problem I see with the left and the right is, the right seems not to be interested in factual information.
It's an opinion piece; ergo, meant to be manipulative.