• eilyra
    +2

    True. Still, I believe such regulation does much more to weaken position of the US, than it does to strengthen against perceived threats, because I'm quite sure as said individuals & companies outside the US would continue using strong crypto, so it doesn't help against that. And I find it hard to believe there aren't more efficient methods for in-country crime fighting that wouldn't severely undermine trust in online transactions as this does. Because if backdoors exist, it's only a matter of time before other actors find them & (ab)use them.

    But as you said, it's certainly possible to make it illegal within the US, but I find it very hard to believe the tradeoffs would in any way be worth it.

    • spaceghoti
      +2

      Oh, I agree. I think they're idiots for making this demand. However, they're looking at this from a security/law and order perspective. They got positively hammered for failing to prevent 9/11 and they've been scrambling to catch up ever since. Even before then during the Clinton administration there was the Clipper Chip scandal where they were demanding backdoor access to computers and encryption. Why?

      "If you knew what I knew, you'd want this too."

      My answer was and continues to be: "until I know what you know, my answer remains 'no.'"