• FurtWigglepants
    +3
    @MAGISTERLUDI -

    You're not being specific. Just "read this document" that doesn't help me understand why. It's like you don't actually have an opinion rather just shouting rhetoric and spoon fed jingoism. How does this 250 year old document translate into modern day woe's especially when the context and nuances of the original have absolutely no bearing here.

  • MAGISTERLUDI (edited 5 years ago)
    +1
    @FurtWigglepants -

    He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.= selective enforcement of Federal Law...... He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harrass our people, and eat out their substance.= NSA, TSA, et al........... He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.=Nuclear treaty with Iran....He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us,= terrorism foreign and domestic, racial divisiveness, et al..

    • FurtWigglepants
      +2
      @MAGISTERLUDI -

      I don't think any of those things are accurately comparable, but thank you for spelling things out.

      Also a hitting enter and then space a few times will format things better.