Considering that there's far more support for taking away health services for low-income women like Planned Parenthood and taking away reproductive rights than for providing support for women or babies after they give birth, I think her characterization is devastatingly accurate. If you object to it, then feel free to prove it wrong.
Tone arguments aside, she's not pulling punches because she's trying to defend women against those who would set us back forty years in women's rights. And she's backing up her statements with facts. So again, I invite you to cite your sources if you wish to dispute her claims.
Considering that there's far more support for taking away health services for low-income women like Planned Parenthood and taking away reproductive rights than for providing support for women or babies after they give birth, I think her characterization is devastatingly accurate. If you object to it, then feel free to prove it wrong.
Tone arguments aside, she's not pulling punches because she's trying to defend women against those who would set us back forty years in women's rights. And she's backing up her statements with facts. So again, I invite you to cite your sources if you wish to dispute her claims.