• spaceghoti
    +3

    In social sciences, yes. But such body of knowledge is careful to examine such testimony to remove human bias. Just because a thousand people testify to what they claim to be a miracle doesn't necessarily mean it was a miracle.

    Bad science tends to get filtered out over time, even when publishers take shortcuts. Bad science gets scrutinized and exposed as fraud. It's true, science publication seems overly concerned with competition which makes the science suffer, but peer review ultimately weeds it out.

    • [Deleted Profile] (edited 8 years ago)

      [This comment was removed]