On that other site I had one person reply that his religious freedoms were being impeded. I asked him for specifics, and he said he's a photographer and he can't refuse to do gay weddings. I pointed out he can refuse anyone but if he agrees to the shoot and then backs out after he learns the couple is gay then he's in for breach of contract. If he's stupid enough to cite intolerance for his reason why then he's going to get intolerance back.
It's not that they can't understand, it's that they don't want to. They were quite happy with the status quo before, thankyouverymuch.
On that other site I had one person reply that his religious freedoms were being impeded. I asked him for specifics, and he said he's a photographer and he can't refuse to do gay weddings. I pointed out he can refuse anyone but if he agrees to the shoot and then backs out after he learns the couple is gay then he's in for breach of contract. If he's stupid enough to cite intolerance for his reason why then he's going to get intolerance back.
It's not that they can't understand, it's that they don't want to. They were quite happy with the status quo before, thankyouverymuch.
Your wrong,................. refusal alone can be enough...........http://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/19/us/weighing...h-in-refusal-to-photograph-ceremony.html?_r=0....... Breach of contract has no bearing in these cases..........http://www.financialexpress.com/article/compa...-refusing-to-bake-cake-for-gay-wedding/96237/ .................A gay couple may intentionally go to a Christian establishment and seek service(s) for their marriage with the intention to sue, then go to another establishment and have their needs met. Kind of like having your cake and eating it too?