• b1ackbird
    +5

    Same. That is seriously questionable. Maybe he once was a psychologist- but I'm having a hard time believing one with a valid license would do this.

    This poor woman needed help- not being mutilated. But there are lots of people out there, to say that she empirically just needed help is beyond me. I can't make that judgement- but I can say I find it all very unlikely. I believe that this woman was purposefully blinded, but I find EVERYTHING else questionable.