LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+52 52 0
Published 3 years ago with 2 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Boudicca
    +7

    I find it incredibly unlikely that a registered psychologist would drop draino into a clients eyes to assist them to become blind.

    • b1ackbird
      +5

      Same. That is seriously questionable. Maybe he once was a psychologist- but I'm having a hard time believing one with a valid license would do this.

      This poor woman needed help- not being mutilated. But there are lots of people out there, to say that she empirically just needed help is beyond me. I can't make that judgement- but I can say I find it all very unlikely. I believe that this woman was purposefully blinded, but I find EVERYTHING else questionable.

  • Gozzin
    +5

    This person needed to have been put in a protective environment. Think of all the people who would love to NOT be blind..I'm disturbed beyond words.

Here are some other snaps you may like...