Having a control group exposed to malaria without protection and actually getting malaria, I would think was an ethical issue.
Yes, it would. But in the scenario I described nobody gets infected on purpose and the exposure risk for control group is just as high as it would be without the trial. Does that make it ethically acceptable for you?
Having a control group exposed to malaria without protection and actually getting malaria, I would think was an ethical issue.
Yes, it would. But in the scenario I described nobody gets infected on purpose and the exposure risk for control group is just as high as it would be without the trial. Does that make it ethically acceptable for you?