Lol. You are literally so full of it that it's coming out of your mouth. Are you seriously comparing the effects of large scale industrialization to the land clearing done by some Native Americans? You know what? Their fires might have wiped out any living thing from the land that they burned but the smoke from your fucking car (along with factories, industrialized agriculture etc.) is slowly and surely turning this planet into a barren fucking wasteland. Take some time to travel the world a bit. Maybe try opening your eyes?
But if you spill waste in a river that goes through your land and continues to your neighbour's land, where he's got a reservoir, would you comment then? After all, all you did was spill in your part of the river and then water magically took the waste away while vegetation growing on your side of the river bed continued to flourish, your neighbour's kids are now developing new eyes and ears one their backs.
Dude, if you're bent on denying that if you cut down a tree, it stays cut, who am to argue with you. A German programmer once consented to being eaten by another human being so you know, whatever you believe in, whatever bubble you want to live inside of, hell knows, you've already made up your mind. I mean this guy died because he was obsessed with being eaten. So the chances that you are going to see things differently are probably 0, next to the German's dude volition.
Also, what you "request" cannot be delivered, not until future generations won't be able stay in the sun for more than 5 minutes. Like I said, no point in arguing.
Amen, buddy. Like I said, it doesn't matter. I just sent you a satellite image taken by NASA highlighting in red forest cover loss in NORTH AMERICA between 2000 and 2005 ALONE. The first article is focused on South America yet the satellite images included North America. Wait for your proof, served exactly as you requested while global temperatures continue to rise every year. But hey, nothing's going on, everything is fine. Good luck with that. Cheers.
I see what you mean. People get a little bit twitchy about climate change deniers. Try not to take it personally if you get mistaken for one. You can't shake a stick without knocking one out of a tree. To your point though, current thinking is that even with the impressive replenishment of very young forests, North America still has about two thirds to three quarters of the forests it had when it was "discovered."
By "people" they mean Native Americans, and by "The Environment" they mean "British Columbia". Little bit of over generalization there.
[This comment was removed]