• cunt
    +1

    People have been writing to inanimate objects for a long time : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Placing_notes_in_the_Western_Wall

    • Qukatt
      +4

      tree's aren't inanimate though; they're living things.

      • cunt
        +1

        but they can't physically move themselves

        • Boudicca
          +6

          Hi, I recommend David Attenborough's "The Secret Life of Plants" . Plants and trees do move across the landscape- not as we or other animals do, but when you watch some of the time lapse sequences it becomes evident that they do move, just at a slower pace. It's fascinating.

          • cunt
            +2

            Thank you. I did not know that. I will look it up tonight as it sounds very interesting

            • Boudicca
              +1

              It is. When you watch the time lapse stuff it really seems like the main difference between us and plants in relation to moving around is just time.

        • SarraMinovsky
          +4

          We may be conflating "sessile" (living but fixed in location, opposite of "motile") with "inanimate" (not living material).

        • Qukatt
          +2

          urm, yeah they do, plants turn towards the sun and twist and grow around things.

          Regardless, the definition of "inanimate" is not movement as many inanimate objects can move but if they are alive or not.