LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • FrootLoops

    That's one advantage i mentioned. I want to be able to get in touch with the down voters.

    • redalastor (edited 4 years ago)
      @FrootLoops -

      Most forum software trying to do what snapzu does offer three responses to reports:

      Confirm : The report is good and is or will be acted upon. The user reported about will be penalized (in karma or otherwise)

      Reject : The report is wrong, spurious, or otherwise should not have been made. The reporter will be penalized.

      Ignore : The report is in a gray area. No one will be penalized.

      Ignore is good for those cases of "We should have a rule about that but we currently don't so I can't punish that person for it.".