Don't mind /u/Spaceghoti, he's projecting his ambivalence and resentment for his own candidate onto yours. I know, I know. It's a totally Republican, even Rovian move. Then again, so's the candidate he's backing, so that makes sense.
Me, I like that Johnson's for there being such a thing as drivers' licenses, unlike so many Libertarians. What do you make of his absolute, unqualified support for TPP in exactly the form it's in now? Does that accord with Libertarian principles in your view?
That's progress. A while ago it seemed you were trying to say Clinton's militarily belligerent, Goldwater Conservative authoritarianism was a brilliant eleven-dimensional chess tactic to steal Republican votes. If you knew right now a Clinton Administration would mean U.S. forces would be in direct combat with Russian forces within two years, would you still vote for Clinton rather than not voting [for president] at all?
Don't mind /u/Spaceghoti, he's projecting his ambivalence and resentment for his own candidate onto yours. I know, I know. It's a totally Republican, even Rovian move. Then again, so's the candidate he's backing, so that makes sense.
Me, I like that Johnson's for there being such a thing as drivers' licenses, unlike so many Libertarians. What do you make of his absolute, unqualified support for TPP in exactly the form it's in now? Does that accord with Libertarian principles in your view?
TIL I'm ambivalent over my second choice candidate.
That's progress. A while ago it seemed you were trying to say Clinton's militarily belligerent, Goldwater Conservative authoritarianism was a brilliant eleven-dimensional chess tactic to steal Republican votes. If you knew right now a Clinton Administration would mean U.S. forces would be in direct combat with Russian forces within two years, would you still vote for Clinton rather than not voting [for president] at all?