LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+14 14 0
Published 3 years ago with 2 Comments
Additional Contributions:

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Ryvaeus
    +1

    Why do we leave our defunct satellites in orbit anyway? Didn't scientists consider from the very beginning that our atmosphere would eventually be overcrowded by useless space junk?

    • Improbability
      +1

      I'm going with money. That seems to be the answer whenever the government is involved.

      Also, accidents - satellites running into each other for example. There's no way to de-orbit a destroyed or failed satellite. Or those jerks that shot that one satellite with a missile.

Here are some other snaps you may like...