Set aside this is a British tabloid chumming the waters with racially-charged third and fourth-hand hearsay because it sells. Let's ignore what appears to be a one-sided version, to the point of dishonesty, of an underlying story, if for no other reason than the subject of land reform in South Africa can be so easily cleaved along racial lines. All that agreed, this article is utter shite.
Set aside this is a British tabloid chumming the waters with racially-charged third and fourth-hand hearsay because it sells. Let's ignore what appears to be a one-sided version, to the point of dishonesty, of an underlying story, if for no other reason than the subject of land reform in South Africa can be so easily cleaved along racial lines. All that agreed, this article is utter shite.