LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
+26 26 0
Published 9 months ago with 3 Comments

Join the Discussion

  • Auto Tier
  • All
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Post Comment
  • Appaloosa (edited 9 months ago)

    Our HR department is touting it's use of AI in searching for candidates. Hogwash.

    Having said that, I am an avid science fiction fan. I do fear a machine that "thinks" and makes decisions...aka, autonomous weapons. I also have this niggling thought that someday machines will develop their own language based on their "thought" processes. Not today, and maybe a long way off. We are beginning the age of advanced biomechanics. We are growing brain tissue. the convergence of man and machine is inevitable. When that happens, will it still be called AI?

  • leweb

    At its best AI is currently a very sophisticated regression tool. If you can use “add trendline”in Excel, you’ve already used a very primitive version of AI.

    There have been very clever uses of it, and I don’t mean to invalidate them, but I wish the media stopped the whole “the machines are becoming sentient and will destroy humanity” hype. On the other hand, they don’t make money by being grounded and objective. Just like politicians don’t win votes by being honest.

    • AdelleChattre

      Minor quibble: this dismissal of AI is too easy, in that it's a rather stinging indictment of the subfield of connectionism more so than, say: symbolic reasoning; genetic algorithms and classifier systems; artificial life more generally evolving computationally over enormous timescales; strong, numerous, belligerent, incorporated AIs; or any number of other approaches. Which isn't to say that even simple linear regression isn't an indispensable tool. It is. I'll admit, though, it'd really harsh my buzz if it was sufficiently expressive for strong AI.

Here are some other snaps you may like...