Thanks so much, Maternitus! I almost didn't read the article because of the paywall, but then I saw your comment and was thrilled with the link to the archived article.

I love your other solution but I don't like to use browser extensions at all.

Agree, and it's truly sad that this statement from Facebook does not surprise anyone.

This actually seems like a really good idea and a sensible way to reduce emissions.

Even I can't really argue with it, and I don't even like Windows! On the other hand, this is just a design concept and not the actual thing. What are the bets that a sensible design like this doesn't even make it into the next version of windows File Explorer?!

This was a fascinating and well-researched article. Thank you for sharing it.

...yet this would be a comparatively easy thing to block in an automated manner. Things like this make me think that Facebook is one of the garbage pits of the internet.

So in other words, you don't have to ACTUALLY remove unlawful content, just prove that you are able to. Not surprised at this suggestion from Mark Zuckerberg.

Very inspirational!

Anyone taking bets on what the name will be?

Also, the bigger issue about lack of bees isn't the lack of honey! It's the lack of ability to easily pollinate plants.

I already use firefox. One thing I would've liked better, is if the article would have explained how from the user's point of view this is different from blocking third-party cookies, or how the change adds more protections. I think I figured some of it out, but since the article is written by the company itself (who presumably knows the details better than anyone else), they could have helped the average user understand the difference better. The detail they had isn't (IMHO) enough to clearly inform users how that is different from other browsers or from existing privacy options within firefox. In other words, great privacy option, but the explanation could have been done better.

Evidently he thinks the rule shouldn't apply to him, lol! Actions speak louder than words, and his actions spoke volumes.

Haha yeah! I never thought we'd see the day where wearing a foil hat would ACTUALLY protect us from anything... but looks like it's happening!

They don't make it easy to find the Linux products, that's for sure! I did find some here https://www.lenovo.com/us/en/think-workstatio...series-towers/ThinkStation-P520/p/33TS3TPP520 but the price tag for that option is HUGE! It's the "developer AI" version of the standard one.

I personally would NEVER buy one of those as a way of getting Linux!! For those looking for an affordable custom-built workstation with Linux pre-installed and with no other OS, I'd recommend ThinkPenguin instead.

Yeah me too about the headphone jacks. Instead, mac users are forced to wear these giant things inside their ears with bits sticking out that look like Q-tips. Maybe some people like that look, but it's definitely not for me!

This is why I'd never buy a Tesla product - they're trying to bundle in too much other junk that I don't want and that can cause problems like this. Even if I wanted (and if I could afford) an electric car, I'd buy one from one of the mainstream carmakers, not Tesla.

This is exactly why I don't buy anything brand-specific on Amazon, nor anything that I would ingest or put on my skin. Amazon has offered sellers tools to take down fraudulent listings by others, but I feel it's too little too late. This bribery scandal is just one more reason why I would only buy things like books from Amazon. For other items, I buy from online retailers who have control over their supply chains.

I don't see why they can't call it XBox Two, or XBox Next, or something sensible like that. They could've crowdsourced the naming for free and gotten a decent name (from gamers who actually use their products) instead of paying huge sums to marketing people who come up with a sucky name.