LOUNGE all new asksnapzu ideasforsnapzu newtribes interesting pics videos funny technology science technews gaming health history worldnews business web research entertainment food living internet socialmedia mobile space sports photography nature animals movies culture travel television finance music celebrities gadgets environment usa crime politics law money justice psychology security cars wtf art google books lifetips bigbrother women apple kids recipes whoa military privacy education facebook medicine computing wildlife design war drugs middleeast diet toplists economy fail violence humor africa microsoft parenting dogs canada neuroscience architecture religion advertising infographics sex journalism disaster software aviation relationships energy booze life japan ukraine newmovies nsa cannabis name Name of the tribe humanrights nasa cute weather gifs discoveries cops futurism football earth dataviz pets guns entrepreneurship fitness android extremeweather fashion insects india northamerica
  • mikeBnimble
    +4

    This article makes a very good point, but I think that statistical error is the tip of the iceberg. A much bigger problem is outright fraud, bought studies by corporations, and a lack of interest in reproducing others' experiments. Incorrect, fraudulent, and/or otherwise misleading studies are printed all the time and are never retracted. The one that are retracted often remain available in online archives, where they are read and cited by new researchers.

    TL;DR I think scientists have been put under too much pressure to produce and publish and the work has gotten sloppy.