Because a state that can't keep the lights on in your house when the wind blows will be fine for most travel via EVs.

Quite likely to happen: They will subcontract a company to manage data to ensure there are no transfers. It will be a shell company with several layers of other shells, that at the root will be a 3-letter agency providing a big sack of money that ultimately ends up in Zuck's bank account.

Since it's perfectly legal from the US side, net change is Zuck gets more money. If the EU ever digs down far enough to declare shenanigans and issues huge fines, the subcontractor declares bankruptcy, and a new subcontractor lathers, rinses, and repeats. Zuck promises to keep a closer eye on things, and gets a new sack of money. If they issue the fine to Facey book instead, it'll be tied up in court and appeals for a decade.

Yes, I am a curmudgeon.

Hilarious that Money = Speech.

Someone should tell the Microsoft Win10 team abut this.

You pick your friends, you can't necessarily pick your family.

So they banned software. How's that going to be enforced?

Will stores still have cameras? Are Ring Doorbells going to be banned?

Good luck banning any technology. The toothpaste isn't going back in the tube.

It's better than live rounds or rubber bullets as a response to a riot.

If LE is improperly using it there are are other solutions to that issue.

How strange. I thought banning plastic straws (and then wrapping paper straws in plastic sleeves) was supposed to fix this.

No, it most likely won't. Careful blood monitoring of levels is required because the therapeutic dose isn't far from the toxic dose. Simply becoming dehydrated can tip you over to toxicity. So tossing in lower levels of lithium so as not to poison anybody isn't going to do anything but waste it.

Unless the discovered link (correlation /= causation) has controlled for population mental health levels, amount of sunlight, pollution, general health, income/poverty levels, and several dozen other things that don't immediately come to mind.

Funny that pro-Trump content is "vandalism". Maybe just a peaceful protest as fallout from banning r/the_donald.

Maybe, just maybe, some of the mods are pro-Trump. Or 1 admin is.

Which coronavirus? (There are hundreds).

I've noticed most of these stories don't specify Covid-19. Sloppy/lazy reporting, or conflation?

All he (The FCC, really) has to do is reclassify them as publishers and/or remove section 230 protections. Then they become legally responsible for their content, and they can censor away to their hearts content.

As it stands now they censor while pretending they are platforms.

So, taxes on poor people are good when it's for their own good?

Let's them up the price more often as they add features.