"Plaintiff's car and her labor were her only assets. Plaintiff's work did not entail any 'managerial' skills that could affect profit or loss. Aside from her car, Plaintiff had no investment in the business. Defendants provided the iPhone application, which was essential to the work. But for Defendant's intellectual property, Plaintiff would not have been able to perform the work."
I wonder if that could affect contractors in other segments. For example, a tech worker provides its own computer but needs the company's IP to do the actual work.
From the court documents
I wonder if that could affect contractors in other segments. For example, a tech worker provides its own computer but needs the company's IP to do the actual work.