Agreed, there are surely other measurements with the likelihood of large margins of error, and I'm sure as technology gets more advanced we can correct those measurements. Are you however denying the possibility that our climate is in fact warming due to human activity on earth?
to your question: no, just saying that comparing CO2 levels from present day to CO2 levels from thousands of years ago measured from ice cores is not a valid way to prove it.
Ok, was just wondering because there is a heck of a lot more evidence for climate change than CO2 measurements. This is a good place to start for anyone wondering why 97% of the climate research community is in consensus about climate change and that fact that our planet's temperature is being affected by human activity.
Agreed, there are surely other measurements with the likelihood of large margins of error, and I'm sure as technology gets more advanced we can correct those measurements. Are you however denying the possibility that our climate is in fact warming due to human activity on earth?
to your question: no, just saying that comparing CO2 levels from present day to CO2 levels from thousands of years ago measured from ice cores is not a valid way to prove it.
Ok, was just wondering because there is a heck of a lot more evidence for climate change than CO2 measurements. This is a good place to start for anyone wondering why 97% of the climate research community is in consensus about climate change and that fact that our planet's temperature is being affected by human activity.
Oh, I know. I just brought up this point because this snap was about incorrect measurements.