The implant consists of a modified Cisco IOS image that allows the attacker to load different functional modules from the anonymity of the internet.
So, this would be considered a local attack. Someone with physical access to the equipment itself is installing a revised version of the IOS firmware on affected devices to which they are able to gain access. It is not a bug. It is a revised firmware which allows access.
So, this would be considered a local attack. Someone with physical access to the equipment itself is installing a revised version of the IOS firmware on affected devices to which they are able to gain access. It is not a bug. It is a revised firmware which allows access.
Helps to reinforce the fact that physical access control Is just as important as security on the configs :/