It might be a good idea to appoint justices without any alliance with political parties and/or religious institutes. Sounds inconceivable, doesn't it? And lifetime appointments, really? That's way too much power for any human being. A periodic cleansing isn't such a bad idea, just set on dates, not likes or dislikes. It would be refreshing in a corrupt policical landscape. Same goes for the influence of money on politics.

Clarence Thomas is the true definition of an asshole. But there's one thing he left out of the things he wants to ban, namely interracial marriage. I wonder why.

As Gen-X person, I do not care either. :-)

And the Oscar goes to....

blub-blub-waaaaalll-eeeee-blub-blub

Never knew that having mental disabilities (read: being a religious extremist) is required to become a judge in the USA.

Everytime I read about solutions like this, it doesn't give an incentive for the plastics & petrochemicals industries to stop overproducing their filth. A bit like electric cars that seem to exist to save the automobile industry or hydrogen to save the fossil fuel industry. I'm starting to have the feeling that it doesn't give a damn what happens to this planet, because shareholders need their goddamn profits. Ah, yes, and growth because of growth. The very definition of a cancercell.

https://hoevenaar.com/ :-)

Hydrogen is far from renewable, since about 95% is made from oil, natural gas and coal.